The imr 8208xbr Diaries
The imr 8208xbr Diaries
Blog Article
So in the full 1350fps HS shell load, 300-mp is type of a better choice with the just about every so somewhat slower burn up fee to offer a number of extra fps within the load, whilst while in the CF hulls at 1200fps, much better off with the 296/H110 that has the slightly faster burn up amount to keep the powder burning a contact cleaner as an alternative.
What I'd like to know is under what problems the tension spikes were being observed. Was it as the plastic 410 wads turned tricky through the cold? Has anyone tried it in the Hornet setting up with 2400 data?
Reviews can only be submitted though currently being logged in. Please enter your login information underneath. New consumer?
Dano523 said: Only problem with not reaming the shot bushing to toss 226 of shot within a HS hull with .296" powder bushing, would be the shot will probably rattle during the shell (my Edition of a exercise only load In case the shot rattles any time you shake the spherical). Click on to develop...
Like all universal loading formulas some load combos will probably be a slightly reduced load Considering that the universal cost is calculated on The premise of the combination of components which is able to provide the highest pressure stage.
The rest of the powders for 410 loads, Have got a melt away pace of close to 295, and just end up burning up the hulls swiftly to start with, and won't ever manage to realize the 1350fps before the ammo goes around force.
Accurate 1680 powder uses the best ballistic professionals and the highest good quality components with each other to guarantee that each gun is better served with Accurate Powders.
all powder will burn off up hulls but Using these 3 I can get 6 to 10 reloads without a challenge. Based on the hull selection There's ample tested load data on This page for these powders. Just search it out you will not be let down.
I think it is a reduced volume powder but because I haven't tried out the Other individuals I do not know the way it compares. I take advantage of AAhs hulls, Gain AAhs wads, Lil Gun, and Fiochi Primers and the shell shoots fantastic even so the shot is loose even with an excellent deep crimp. Any one else have this issue. Jackie B.
As for that AA compression hulls, it absolutely was it is, and your heading to have a slight rattle with only 214gr of shot and reduced volume of powder instead.
The knowledge supplied on this Web page is for general applications only and isn't going to represent professional assistance. We make just about every hard work to ensure the accuracy and trustworthiness of the information, but we don't warranty its go now completeness or suitability for just about any unique goal.
Increase to quotation Only present this consumer #3 look at more info · Mar seven, 2008 Possessing shot skeet for quite a few many years utilizing the 410 gauge I've reloaded my share of these shells. I'm not familiar with the AAHS shells Unless of course you are referring to WW Double AA's. Discovered that this gauge is very sensitive to components made use of. Whilst distinct resources say there powders will perform, I found that only a couple would get the job done with little problems. Many others would do considered one of two points--Allow the wad seat far too minimal or much too high.
Conclusion: Accurate 1680 Powder is really a high-performance option for small caliber rifles and pistols, providing constant overall performance and accuracy for discerning marksmen.
Ibericafé stresses the value of the item as well as the every day effort to make a tailored, price-primarily based service for his or her clientele by applying deep understanding of both equally product or service and market.